| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
57
   |
Posted - 2012.05.05 17:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
Please make the new interface optional or allow us multiple windows and bring back old ships and hanger buttons (again make them optional if you want) just bring them back.
Tal
|
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 12:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
There is an official thread for this in the Eve information portal. Devs seems to be reading that one.
New dev blog: Unified inventory
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=104383
Tal |
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 12:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Loghaire wrote:Tiger's Spirit wrote:Loghaire wrote:
I disagree with the requirement of multiple windows for inventory management
And we disaggre with you, thx bye. Part of customisation requests is to be able to tailor an interface into particular workflows. I like my workflows with less windows, like how I like web browsing with tabs and not an ungodly number of windows like the bad old days of IE6. *shudders* Also, note I said requirement. I disagree with the requirement of, not the existence or implementation of multiple windows for file/inventory management. What is wrong with being able to do tasks with less windows? I think it is perfectly valid to want to be able to do something with just a single window versus 2 or more. For some things, it would be quicker if all it took was a single window. If you want multiple windows, that is just fine too. Customisation and all. Also, nothing wrong with giving feedback in a feedback thread  "thx bye"
Nothing, but is should be an option, if you want to use less windows fine if you like the old system then again fine. Just don't force the change.
Tal
|
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 19:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Goliath wrote:Guys, honestly, the teams and I appreciate the feedback, and we do read it.
There is a recurrent theme in this thread of "change isn't improvement, its change", and to that I would just say look at the evolution of software as a whole - compare Windows 95 to Windows 8, IE to Chrome, etc - things can't be static forever and must evolve, sometimes in a dramatic way. Usability issues are excellent feedback. Simply saying "it's different, I don't want to adjust, give me the old one" is not particularly useful to the team. They have selected the design direction they are going in and it's not just a case of putting in a checkbox that says "use old system X" to cater to those who aren't keen on a slight adjustment to a system.
Please do keep the usability feedback coming though - for instance, the behaviour of using "loot all" and then having an extra cargo window - this is the kind of use issue that can be dealt with.
You guys are not listening, the arrogance displayed here is amazing. I like change, but only if it improves my life.. Devs coming in here and saying " I have used it for ages and now I cringe thinking of going back to the the old system" or "its all about acclimatisation you'll get used to it" and my favourite "slight adjustment to the system" what ever you are smoking I want some. Slight change that affects nearly everything you do ?? come on.
No No No
The interface should be intuitive, you should not have to think about using it especially a windows based system, it should be second nature. Your system goes against the grain feels claustrophobic and awkward and 5 minutes with it wanted to make me throw my keyboard through the TV, makes simple tasks harder and most feedback has been negative.
This isn't an evolution this is some one telling me Windows 7 is old and what do I think of this shiny new Abacus which is replacing it.
If you like it great you use it, just leave the old system in place for the rest of us as an option. Don't try to persuade us to like something we don't.
The feedback here will be as nothing to what you will get from the main forums if this goes live like this. For once listen to your customers (who are trying to help), or was all that talk a while back about being sorry and ignoring the customer base.
Tal
|
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
68
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 16:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
So like it or tough seems to be the general message from CCP. Nice 
Thanks
Tal
|
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
69
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 22:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Rrama Ratamnim wrote:Talon SilverHawk wrote:So like it or tough seems to be the general message from CCP. Nice Thanks Tal Thats not wha tthey said, they said theres no going, back but they will work to make things usable and better for everyone as time goes on, for the love of god its a beta on sisi, of a first release of the new item system... its insane the amount of rage these kind of things get... Personally only thing i see missing is SymLinks... to open directly a small cargo window or ship window if i click the old buttons, from there old location as well as the old right click hip menu (and the corp hanger as well) ... that would solve so much of the whining.
Lol filled with rage no, just annoyed they are bringing in something to fix something that isn't broken and makes life more awkward.
And yes it is, we haven't been a given a choice. They might have thought to ask, actually maybe some of our customers might like multiple windows without jumping through hoops and left the option there.
I've tried it again tonight and still dislike the new system, but filled with rage no,
Tal
|
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
100
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 22:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Although I dislike this new system, (I really hate the tree view, and the added clicks and key presses to carry out the same tasks) I feel sorry for the devs, must be tough knowing your going to be responsible for a really unpopular change.
Tal |
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
101
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 12:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rommiee wrote:Talon SilverHawk wrote:Although I dislike this new system, (I really hate the tree view, and the added clicks and key presses to carry out the same tasks) I feel sorry for the devs, must be tough knowing your going to be responsible for a really unpopular change.
Tal Easy solution for the poor Devs that are bringing this crap in. Don't. Sorted
Apparently they can't roll back for this "minor change" (according to their earlier posts) 
Tal
|
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
101
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 12:46:00 -
[9] - Quote
Exodus 4D wrote:I love the new inventory system. Much cleaner/faster than the old structure.
Keep it up! N1 change. At least a beginning of a few windows less.
Glad you like it but some of us like multiple windows. should be an option, not forced on players.
Tal
|
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
106
|
Posted - 2012.05.21 12:24:00 -
[10] - Quote
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Hyperion O'Coeus wrote:
The CSMs are not acting in accordance with the player base. They simply sided with CCP and that was the end of it. They should have taken our cause and ask what we need or want and how to make it better for US. Instead they just rolled over and spooned with CCP.
That Zombie-Like Unanimous Chant of thiers about "It's great" on EveRadio was actually frightening. And nauseating.
Did they really. oh well we'll see what happens when this goes live. Maybe they think they can ignore the feedback here, believing we are just whining, in the hope that the greater EVE will love the changes.
Tal
|
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
216
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
Off topic but why are manufacturing requirements going to be earned through FW. I have a mate who does production, hes put alot of work into it, and now datacores are going to FW, why? , haven't you screwed up the hi sec economy enough already, (dont get me started on loot drops from lvl 4's).
You will loose industrialist gamers to these changes.
Tal
|
| |
|